Home › Assessment and Rating Preparation
Preparing for an Assessment and Rating visit: a research checklist for ECEC operators
An Assessment and Rating (A&R) visit is the moment a centre's compliance discipline meets the regulator. This page covers the typical pre-visit timeline, what assessors review and observe, and the structured preparation that consistently produces better outcomes — without the last-minute panic.
The timeline
6 weeks before
- Notification letter arrives from the regulatory authority
- Confirm the proposed dates; request a change only for genuine operational reasons
- Start a structured QIP review (see the QIP guide)
4 weeks before
- Submit any updated QIP via the National Quality Agenda IT System (NQA ITS)
- Brief educators on the visit timeline and what to expect
- Cross-check policy register against the most recent National Regulations version
- Walk the premises with QA3 in mind (physical environment risks)
2 weeks before
- Run a mock-visit walkthrough — have someone external (or a colleague playing assessor) tour the centre
- Confirm staffing roster including qualification cover
- Pull medication, incident, sleep, and food-safety records for the past 6 months
- Verify display of mandatory information (service approval certificate, current rating, public liability insurance)
Day of
- Welcome assessor(s), provide a brief service tour (15-20 min)
- Make documentation available on request (digital or physical)
- Educators carry on with normal practice — resist the urge to perform
- Closing meeting at end of day to discuss preliminary observations
After
- Draft rating report within 30 days of the visit
- Service has the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft
- Final rating report issued after feedback is considered
- Rating is published on ACECQA's national register
What assessors review
The documentation set assessors typically request:
- Quality Improvement Plan (Reg 55-56) — current version, dated, with self-assessment for all 7 QAs
- Service philosophy statement (Reg 55) — visible in the service, reflected in practice
- Policies and procedures register (Reg 168) — complete coverage of the policies required under Reg 168, with review dates
- Staffing records — qualification certificates (Reg 126), Working with Children Checks, first aid certification (Reg 136), continuing professional development
- Child enrolment records (Reg 160) — complete enrolment, authorisation to collect (Reg 99), health information (Reg 162), risk minimisation plans for children with medical conditions (Reg 90)
- Programming documentation — evidence the educational program is documented and used to plan
- Medication register (Reg 95-96) — permission, administration log, witness signatures
- Incident, injury, trauma and illness register (Reg 87) — complete records, parent notification documented
- Notifications to regulator (Reg 175-176) — serious incidents, complaints, and circumstance changes notified within prescribed timeframes
- Sleep and rest documentation — consistent with the service's policy (Reg 81)
- Food and nutrition (Reg 78-80) — menu visible, allergy management documented
What assessors observe
Beyond documentation, assessors spend significant time observing practice. They are looking for:
- Educator-child interactions — warmth, responsiveness, active engagement (QA5)
- Supervision practice — positioning, sightlines, active vs passive supervision (QA2)
- Ratio compliance in operating reality — not just the roster, but actual deployment including transitions (see ratios reference)
- Behaviour guidance approach — calm, child-centred, consistent with the documented policy (QA5)
- Physical environment use — resources accessible to children, evidence of intentional teaching opportunities (QA3 + QA1)
- Hygiene and food safety — handwashing protocols followed, nappy change procedures, food storage and serving (QA2)
- Sleep and rest practice — ratios maintained during rest, safe sleeping practices observed (QA2)
- Family interaction at arrival and pick-up — engagement quality, information exchange (QA6)
The "documentation vs observation" mismatch
The single most common drop-to-Working-Towards is a gap between what the service's documentation describes and what the assessor sees in the rooms. A polished QIP and policy register paired with weak observed practice doesn't help. Equally, strong observed practice paired with patchy documentation drops governance (QA7). Both have to be consistent.
Quick pre-visit checklist
If you have one week to prepare, focus on:
- QIP currency — ensure the document is dated within the last 90 days and references current improvements in progress
- Service philosophy display — visible at entry and known to educators
- Critical policies review — child protection, medication, incident response, sleep and rest, supervision (these get tested most often)
- Qualification records complete — including evidence of WWCC currency for every educator
- Risk management plan walkthrough — physical environment hazards, excursion approvals, water safety
- Educator briefing — what to expect, encourage normal practice rather than performance
- Documentation accessibility — assessors should not have to wait 20 minutes for a record to be located
Ask a specific A&R question
Ask WIDEN Law about any specific regulation or NQS element the visit will cover. Get the actual section with a clickable source.
Try free for 30 days →
Frequently asked questions
How much notice do services get before an A&R visit?
Typically 4-6 weeks written notice. Spot visits driven by compliance concerns or notifications can be unannounced.
What documents do assessors look at?
The QIP, policies and procedures, staffing records, enrolment records, programming documentation, medication and incident registers, and the educator qualifications register. They also observe practice.
What happens if a service is rated Working Towards?
The service receives a draft rating report identifying the elements below NQS, has the opportunity to provide feedback, then a final report. Working Towards services are typically reassessed more frequently than Meeting NQS services.
Can a rating be appealed?
Yes — first-tier review by the regulatory authority, then second-tier review by the relevant Tribunal. Operators should understand the evidence base for the rating before deciding to appeal.
Are spot visits common?
Spot visits are typically triggered by a notification (serious incident, complaint, or another regulatory concern) or as part of risk-based monitoring. They focus on the area of concern rather than the full NQS.
This page is a research summary, not legal or compliance advice. Always check current ACECQA guidance and your state regulator's specific procedures before relying on this for an actual A&R visit.