NQS Standard 7.1: Governance (elements 7.1.1 to 7.1.3) explained

Last reviewed: 8 November 2026. Standard and element wording from Schedule 1 of the Education and Care Services National Regulations as published on ACECQA’s Quality Area 7 page, checked on 8 November 2026. Explanations and model answers are in our own words.

Quick answer

Standard 7.1 (Governance): Governance supports the operation of a quality service that is child safe. It has 3 elements:

For each element below: what it means in practice, what an assessor looks for, the common gaps, and a model short answer for “briefly explain” questions in certificate III and diploma assessments.

Element 7.1.1: Service philosophy and purpose

“A statement of philosophy guides all aspects of the service’s operations.”

What it means: The philosophy is a living statement of what the service believes about children, learning, families and community, and it visibly shapes decisions: recruitment, the program, policies and how families are welcomed.

What an assessor looks for:

Common gaps: A philosophy on the wall that staff cannot connect to practice; not reviewed since the 2009 EYLF.

Model short answer (Element 7.1.1)

Element 7.1.1 requires the service to have a statement of philosophy that actually guides everything it does, from the educational program to policies and day-to-day decisions.

Element 7.1.2: Management systems

“Systems are in place to manage risk and enable the effective management and operation of a quality service that is child safe.”

What it means: Behind the service sit working systems for risk, records, policies, notifications, recruitment and screening, complaints and compliance. Since 1 January 2026 the element explicitly says the service must be child safe.

What an assessor looks for:

Common gaps: Policies not reviewed or not followed; notifications missed; screening records incomplete.

Model short answer (Element 7.1.2)

Element 7.1.2 requires systems for managing risk and running the service effectively, such as policies, records, recruitment and compliance processes, so that it operates as a quality service that is child safe.

Element 7.1.3: Roles and responsibilities

“Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, and understood, and support effective decision making and operation of the service.”

What it means: Everyone knows who is responsible for what: the approved provider, persons with management or control, the nominated supervisor, the responsible person, the educational leader and educators, and decisions are made by the right people.

What an assessor looks for:

Common gaps: Confusion about who is the responsible person on a shift; roles described on paper but not followed.

Model short answer (Element 7.1.3)

Element 7.1.3 means roles and responsibilities are clearly set out and understood by everyone, so decisions are made by the right people and the service runs effectively.

The regulations behind Standard 7.1

The 2026 “child safe” wording is explained in NQS changes 2026.

See the whole quality area in Quality Area 7: Governance and leadership, or all 40 elements on one page.

Frequently asked questions

What is NQS Standard 7.1?

Standard 7.1 (Governance): governance supports the operation of a quality service that is child safe. Its elements are 7.1.1 Service philosophy and purpose, 7.1.2 Management systems, and 7.1.3 Roles and responsibilities.

What is element 7.1.1?

A statement of philosophy guides all aspects of the service's operations.

What changed in Standard 7.1 in 2026?

From 1 January 2026, Standard 7.1 and Element 7.1.2 refer to a quality service that is child safe.

What is element 7.1.3 roles and responsibilities?

Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and understood, and support effective decision making and operation of the service.

Ask the question in your own words

WIDEN Law answers National Quality Framework questions with inline citations to the National Law, the Regulations and the NQS, so you can check the source provision yourself.

14-day free trial, no card →

This page is a research summary, not legal or compliance advice. It is written in our own words from the sources linked on the page; confirm the position with your regulatory authority before relying on it for a compliance decision.